Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Adicionar filtros

Base de dados
Tópicos
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano
1.
HemaSphere ; 6:365-367, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2032120

RESUMO

Background: Patients with lymphoproliferatie diseases (LPD) appear particularly ulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection, partly because of the effects of the anti-neoplastic regimens (chemotherapy, signaling pathway inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies) on the immune system. The real impact of COVID-19 on the life expectancy of patients with different subtypes of lymphoma and targeted treatment is still unknown. Aims: The aim of this study is to describe and analyse the outcome of COVID-19 patients with underlying LPD treated with targeted drugs such as monoclonal antibodies (obinutuzumab, ofatumumab, brentuximab, niolumab or pembrolizumab), BTK inhibitors (ibrutinib, acalabrutinib), PI3K inhibitors (idelalisib), BCL2 inhibitors (enetoclax) and IMIDs, (lenalidomide). Methods: The surey was supported by EPICOVIDEHA registry. Adult patients with baseline CLL or non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) treated with targeted drugs and laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosed between January 2020 and January 2022 were selected. Results: The study included 368 patients (CLL n=205, 55.7%;NHL n=163, 44.3%) treated with targeted drugs (Table 1). Median follow-up was 70.5 days (range 19-159). Most used targeted drugs were ITKs (51.1%), anti-CD20 other than rituximab (16%), BCL2 inhibitors (7.3%) and lenalidomide (7.9%). Of note, only 16.0% of the patients were accinated with 2 or more doses of accine at the onset of COVID-19. Pulmonary symptoms were present at diagnosis in 244 patients (66.2%). Seere COVID-19 was obsered in 47.8 % patients while 21.7% were admitted to to intensie care unit (ICU), being 55 (26.8%) CLL patients and 25 (15.3%) NHL patients. More comorbidities were reported in patients with seere-critical COVID-19 compared to those with mild- asymptomatic infection (p=0.002). This difference was releant in patients with chronic heart diseases (p=0.005). Oerall, 134 patients (36.4%) died. Primary cause of death was COVID-19 in 92 patients (68.7%), LPD in 14 patients (10.4%), and a combination of both in 28 patients (20.9%).Mortality was 24.2% (89/368) at day 30 and 34.5%(127/368) at day 200. After a Cox multiariable regression age >75 years (p<0.001, HR 1.030), actie malignancy (p=0.011, HR 1.574) and admission to ICU (p<0.00, HR 4.624) were obsered as risk factors. Surial in patients admitted to ICU was 33.7% (LLC 38.1%, NHL 24%). Mortality rate decreased depending on accination status, being 34.2% in not accinated patients, 15.9-18% with one or two doses, decreasing to 9.7% in patients with booster dose (p<0.001). There was no difference in OS in NLH s CLL patients (p=0.344), nor in ITKs s no ITKs treated patients (p=0.987). Additionally, mortality rate dropped from the first semester 2020 (41.3%) to last semester 2021 (25%). Summary/Conclusion: - Our results confirm that patients with B--mallignancies treatted with targeted drugs hae a high risk off seere infection (47.8%) and mortality (36.4%) from COVID-19. - Pressence of comorbidities,, especially heart disease,, is a risk factor for seere COVIID--19 infection in ourr series. - Age >75 years,, actie mallignancy att COVIID--19 onset and ICU admission were mortality risk factors. - COVIID--19 acination was a protectie factor for mortality,, een iin this popullation wiitth humorall immunity impairment. - The learning cure in the management of the infection throughout the pandemiic and the deelopmentt off COVIID--19 treatments showed benefit in this partticullarlly ullnerablle popullation? (Table Presented).

2.
Leukemia and Lymphoma ; 62(SUPPL 1):S122-S123, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1747049

RESUMO

Introduction: Patients with hematological malignancies have a higher susceptibility to develop severe COVID-19 and their humoral response to vaccination is usually impaired due to the immunosuppression caused by treatments or the disease itself. A recent prospective study that analyzed the humoral response to the BNT162b messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccine in patients with CLL showed an antibody response rate of 39.5%, significantly lower than that of sex- and agematched healthy controls. Patients with active disease or under treatment, especially with targeted agents were the ones with the worst humoral response (Herinashu et al., 2021). More data are needed to validate these results and enhance protective strategies in those patients. In this study, we aimed to assess the humoral response following vaccination with the mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in a cohort of CLL patients from routine clinical practice and compared it with patients with other hematological neoplasms. Methods: Twenty-two CLL patients underwent blood sampling 2-4 weeks after the second dose of BNT162b2 (Pfizer- BioNTech) or mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccine. A control group was composed of 65 patients with other hematological cancers that also received mRNA vaccines. IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Spike antigen were measured using electrochemiluminescent assay (ADVIA Centaur XPT, Siemens), and responses reported as index inferior or superior to 1 (range 0.50-150.00), being index <1.00 informed as no reactive and index >1.00 as reactive. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS, version 22.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics, IBM Corporation). Results: CLL patient's characteristics are shown in Table 1. Antibody-response to the vaccine was only obtained in 54.5% of the patients with CLL (12/22) and was significantly lower than that observed in the control group, in which 77.8% of the patients with other malignancies seroconverted (p=0.03), Figure 1. The other malignancies group was composed of multiple myeloma (N=21);indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (N=12), Hodgkin lymphoma (N=5);acute myeloblastic leukemia (N=1);myeloproliferative neoplasms (N=12);myelodysplastic syndromes (N=7) and aggressive NHL (N=7). Antibody titers in patients with CLL showed a trend to be lower than the control group [median 3.16 (0-150) vs. 52.95 (0-150), p=0.133]. Focusing on CLL patients, antibody response rate was higher when disease was not active (75 vs. 43%, p=0.1) and in treatment-naïve patients (66.7 vs. 52.6%, p=0.6). Moreover, we observed similar responses in patients who obtained clinical remission after treatment (56.6 vs. 50%, p=0.8%). In patients under treatment with targeted drugs (Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) or venetoclax based regimens) at the time of vaccination, antibody response rates were significantly lower (33 vs. 80%, p=0.03). Specifically, 40% of patients under BTKi showed a serologic response, and only 25% of patients under venetoclax-based regimens. Of note, at the moment of the study, the disease was controlled in all patients under continuous treatment. Conclusions: Antibody-mediated response to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in CLL patients is significantly impaired in comparison to other onco-hematological diseases. Our series confirms better response rates when the disease is controlled and in treatment-naïve patients, showing slightly better responses than published to date (54.5 vs. 39.5%), which reinforces the need to vaccine CLL patients as some of them will benefit. Special concern must be taken to patients treated with targeted drugs, who show very low humoral responses. Therefore, in this vulnerable population, preventive measures, such as masks wearing, social distancing, and co-habitants vaccination should be reinforced.

3.
Blood ; 136:37-40, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1348289

RESUMO

Introduction:Recently there has been a renewal of therapeutic tools for the treatment of lymphoid neoplasms to increase the antitumor efficacy and reduce the toxicity generated by conventional chemotherapies, which adds to the intrinsic immunological dysfunction of the disease itself. To date, few data are published about infection risk of these new drugs, and the need for infectious prophylaxis is unknown. The aim of the study is to analyze the infectious complications in patients with LPD treated with monoclonal antibodies (obinutuzumab, ofatumumab, brentuximab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab), BTK inhibitors (ibrutinib, acalabrutinib) and PI3K inhibitors (idelalisib). Methods: Multicenter retrospective study in patients with LPD treated with targeted therapies (single agents or combination) in 18 Hematology centers in Spain, from the time of their commercial availability to March 2020. Patients in clinical trials were excluded as well as patients with active infections at the beginning of treatment. Results:During the study period, 380 patients were included.Baseline characteristics of the entire cohort are shown in Table 1.Median follow-up was 17.3 months (range 0-103), the longest follow-up corresponding to CLL patients (24 months, range 0-98) and the shortest to LBCL (5 months, range 0-25). Median exposure to target drugs was 8 months (range 0-72).Ibrutinib was administered to 219 patients(1 FL, 147 CLL, 27 MCL, 10 DLBCL, 1 TL and 32 WM, 1 HL),Brentuximab to 49(31 HL, 14 TL and 4 DLBCL) andIdelalisibto 35 patients (16 affected by chronic lymphocytic leukemia - CLL, 15 FL and 1 DLBCL, 1 WM, 1MCL, 1HL).Obinutuzumabcombinations were used in 10 (6 CLL, 3 FL, 1 MCL) and 5 HL patients (of which 4/5 underwent previous BMT) receivedNivolumab. A total number of 237 infectious events occurred in 148/380 patients (38.9%), 39% of which were grade 3 and 54/148 (36.4%) experienced 2 or more infective episodes: of those 54, 21 (38%) had underwent 3 or more lines of therapy and 28 (51%) had hypogammaglobulinemia. Hospitalization was required in 59.2% events. A bacterial cause of infection was reported in 40% of cases, and viral in 16%, including 11/237 (4,6%) SARS-CoV-2 infection. Invasive fungal infection (IFI) occurred in 3.3% (8/237). Noteworthy, no case of PJP was identified. Lung was the most frequent site of infection in 24% of cases (57/237) while the upper respiratory tract was involved in 17% of events (41/237). Urinary tract infections were diagnosed in 10% (24/237). Other sites involved were skin and soft tissue 7%, gastrointestinal tract 5,4%, bloodstream infections 3% and catheter related infections 2,5%. Considering drugs individually, 86 patients that receivedIbrutinib(39.2 %)experienced a total of 137 infectious episodes: 30% bacterial, 19% viral, 5% fungal and 45% clinical and image-based infections;the 17(34.6%of those who received Brentuximab, experienced a total of 16 infectious episodes: 56% bacterial, 37.5% viral infections and one catheter-related sepsis. Of those who receivedIdelalisib,18 (51.4%)experienced a total of 28 episodes: 42% bacterial, 14% viral and 7% fungal. Four patients treated withObinutuzumabcombinations (40%) experienced one infection during treatment (25% bacterial and 75% viral). Only one patient treated withNivolumabexperienced more than three infections, he was also under corticosteroid treatment. Focusing on IFI (Table 2): 7/8 infections were identified in CLL patients, 6 out 7 being on ibrutinib treatment and 1/7 on Idelalisib.Aspergilluswas the fungus most frequently isolated. The targeted drug was discontinued temporarily in 4 patients and indefinitely in 3. Twenty three (6%) patients died due to infection in our series. Conclusions: 1. We identified 38.7% infections in our LPD patients treated with targeted drugs, with a median drug-exposure time of 8 months (range 0-72), with a non-negligible incidence of bacterial infections. 2. The highest rates of infection were found in patients treated with with Idelalisib and Ibrutinib (51.4% and 39.2% respectively). 3. IFI (3.3%) occurr d with low frequency, mostly in CLL patients during ibrutinib treatment, leading to its temporal discontinuation in most of the cases. 4. No case of PJP was identified in our cohort. 5. An analysis to determine risk factors for infection and the optimal monitoring and prophylaxis for these patients is ongoing. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Hernandez-Rivas:Janssen:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Abbvie:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Roche:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;AstraZeneca:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Gilead:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Celgene/BMS:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Rovi:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.Lopez-Guillermo:novartis:Consultancy;celgene:Consultancy, Research Funding;roche:Consultancy, Research Funding;gilead:Consultancy, Research Funding.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA